Discussion about this post

User's avatar
petrapie's avatar

Also true for those of us in our 70s!

Johan's avatar
1hEdited

The premise here doesn’t seem to apply to what I see as the growth-driven life approach. “Ground kept moving, you kept up, now you’re tired” treats adaptation as burden. It’s not. It’s evidence of capacity.

Behavioral reality: humans are adaptation machines. We’re built for variable environments, novel stimuli, pattern recognition under uncertainty. Growth-driven life isn’t exhausting…stagnation is. Sitting still while your cognitive architecture is designed for navigation produces the low-grade despair people mistake for wisdom.

The impatience, the exploration, the churn, that’s not a bug. That’s optimal functioning. You’re responding to information, updating, moving toward what’s interesting. System 2 doing its job while System 1 gets dopamine from novelty and mastery.

That’s also the beauty of living and spending time in our natural environment, nature—-ever evolving/changing.

The cultural narrative that you’re supposed to “arrive” and rest? That’s mythology from people who confused exhaustion from misalignment with exhaustion from engagement. If the ground is moving and you’re keeping up, you’re not tired, you’re alive. Fatigue comes from fighting the movement or pretending it’s not happening.

Stillness within movement, observing then choosing direction, is mastery. Stillness as escape from adaptation is just optimizing for the wrong metric.

Thank you for this interesting piece that made me reflect.

—Johan

Someone who has never kept still but has gone on meditation retreat for weeks at a time. (I guess I’m a weird contradiction ;))

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?